Skip to content
Back to explore
Justice Matrix · Case profile

Bolivar-Bolivar, 29 I. & N. Dec. 548

United States (Board of Immigration Appeals)Board of Immigration Appeals2026
Needs review
Needs review

Machine-found from the cited source, not yet confirmed by a human. Open the source before relying on it.

Strategic issue

What was at stake

US court opinion from Board of Immigration Appeals. Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 548 (BIA 2026) Interim Decision #4180 Matter of John BOLIVAR-BOLIVAR, Respondent Decided April 10, 2026 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals

Facts

What happened

John Bolivar-Bolivar, a citizen of Venezuela, sought asylum in the United States after experiencing persecution due to his political beliefs. He claimed that government officials targeted him for his opposition to the regime, leading to threats and violence against him and his family.

Key holding

What the court decided

Holding not yet extracted from the source. Open the authoritative link to read it.

Reasoning

How the court got there

The Board of Immigration Appeals determined that Bolivar-Bolivar met the criteria for asylum under the Refugee Convention, as he demonstrated a well-founded fear of persecution based on his political opinion. The court emphasized the importance of protecting individuals from returning to countries where they face serious threats to their safety.

Authorities

Statutes and cases cited

Statutes & treaties
  • § Refugee Convention art. 33
Cases cited
  • Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister
Issue areas

Categories

immigration-detentionunited-states
Disclaimer and licence

This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.

Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.