France - CNDA, 17 December 2009, Mr. T., n°641626
Machine-found from the cited source, not yet confirmed by a human. Open the source before relying on it.
What was at stake
EDAL summary. Vendetta constitutes a serious harm falling within the scope of subsidiary protection.
What the court decided
The Court ruled that the applicant, a Kosovar of Albanian origin, established a real risk of being subjected to a vendetta according to the Kanun rule, which constitutes a serious harm under Article L.712-1 b) Ceseda (transposing Article 15(b) of the Qualification Directive). The Court found that the applicant could not avail himself of the protection of the authorities, thus qualifying him for subsidiary protection.
Categories
Authoritative link
This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.
Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.