Ireland - High Court, 9 February 2011, H. I. D. (a minor) & Anor v Refugee Applications Commissioner & Ors [2011] IEHC 33
Machine-found from the cited source, not yet confirmed by a human. Open the source before relying on it.
What was at stake
EDAL summary. The cases concerned two important issues: whether the processing of the refugee applications had been unlawfully accelerated or prioritised on the basis that the applicants were Nigerian, and whether...
What the court decided
The court decided that Article 23(3) of the Procedures Directive permits prioritisation or acceleration of any category of case and that the refugee appeals procedure in Ireland satisfies Article 39 of the Procedures Directive, thus the processing of the refugee applications was not unlawfully accelerated or prioritised.
Categories
This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.
Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.