CASE OF HAGHILO v. CYPRUS (no. 47920/12)
Machine-found from the cited source, not yet confirmed by a human. Open the source before relying on it.
What was at stake
Whether Cyprus has taken sufficient measures to prevent new violations and to comply with the Court's judgment, satisfying the right to enforcement of judgments.
What happened
The applicant, Haghilo, alleged that the Republic of Cyprus had failed to implement sufficient measures to prevent further violations and had not fully complied with a prior European Court of Human Rights judgment, including the payment of awarded compensation.
What the court decided
The Court found that the government supplied adequate information about measures to prevent new violations and that the compensation awarded in the judgment had been paid, concluding that the State met its obligations under the judgment.
How the court got there
The Court examined the information provided by the Cypriot government regarding the steps taken to prevent new violations and verified that the compensation ordered in the earlier judgment had been paid. Concluding that these actions satisfied the State’s obligations under the judgment, the Court held that Cyprus had complied with the enforcement requirements.
Statutes and cases cited
- § Refugee Convention art. 33
- Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister
Categories
This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.
Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.